Dysons filtration? Original Message Feb 10, 2010 12:46 pm
How sealed are Dysons? And how good is their filtration? I know the uprights - at least the older, older ones like the DC07 and such might have potential problems with sealing, such as show in this video right here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXA0N0V2uOQ However there could simply be something wrong w/ that one, who knows. BUT ANYWAYS, are the NEWER uprights COMPLETELY sealed? What about their canisters, such as the DC22, 23? Like does any air blow out of the cord reel or such, or ONLY out of the exhaust where it's SUPPOSED to come out from?
Re: Dysons filtration? Reply #119 Apr 17, 2010 9:44 am
Venson wrote:
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again . . .
Actually I believe I gave a splendid example/s. Gasko could be giving the worst advice in the world and yet he had (I’ve not looked an quite a while) a following 100-200 times greater than the rare consumer who’s dared to show their face here seeking advice on anything. Numbers don’t lie, when two vacuum dealers are freely giving advice online and one is ignored and one is sought out. That’s enough proof for me (and for most). Carmine, and others blasted the Abby newbie when he had the audacity to post his liking for the DC26. He posted once, was blasted (or topic blasted) and left.
Again, Model2 was chased out and the guy had 100,000 views just on his DC24 Youtube video. Carmine, Mole, Procare, Lucky1, Retardturtle and even Venson/Severus use this site as a anti-Dyosn platform for two primary reasons… lie of Dyson (for sport) and to lie of Dyson (for profit). Any outsider reading these boldface lies and attacks on Dyson no-doubt stays away.
Do you think Carmine, Mole, Lucky1, Procare, Retardturtle and/or Venson/Severus can prove that Dyson vacuums leak dust (blow dust) from the suction/upstream side? I don’t.
DIB I don't see numbers meaning much in this case at all. The web is full of of people with high hit counts that give all kinds of advice. Whether the world is better for it has yet to be determined. What's called for in choosing a vacuum is clear knowledge of one's needs and plain facts.
By the way, what's a 100,000 web hits worth? Per the U.S. World and Population Clocks ( http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html ) we have about 309,000,000 inhabitants in a country where individual CD sales are not considered even fair to middling until well past the 500,000 peices mark. Speaking percentages, the 100,000 hits does not appear phenomenal.
No, personally I do not care much for Dyson and never did. I remain not much impressed with its performance and have owned bagless vacs that pleased me more whatever they may have or may have not borrowed technologically. Neither do I like Dyson's design or attachment set up – and never will.
Still I have no reason to lie and there is nothing I stand to gain by doing so. Yes, I have my ambitions and it's my hope that any advice I may have given here has been constructively helpful to all those asking but I have not received or been offered remuneration by any vac manufacturer or kindred business entity. No way in the least do I presume I've scored any points even with vac makers I often speak well of. AND – not a soul has sent me any freebies for all my yakking. My conscience is clear.
My opinions are pretty even handed and, I believe, well-founded not by number quotes but by use of more brands and machines than I can count and the experience that comes from that. If I said Dyson is over-priced I have also said that Miele, Aerus and any number of other vac manufacturers have gone way overboard on their pricing in consideration of what's being offered. I've followed suit regarding issues of performance and design.
It's foolish to harp on one specific brand as there has been no be all, end all vacuum cleaner yet made. Vacuum buyers are inundated with insignificant and confusing numbers -- amps, watts, air watts, microns, range – to leave them too stunned for a clear view of the really big numbers on price tags.
People looking for decent vacuums don't need to play number or name games. They need sound advice as to what vacuum may best provide good performance, reasonably easy use and durability per the individual budget and living situation.
Whether Dyson leaks or not is not much in my concern. Whatever the case, if someone feels they have to have a Dyson that's fine by me too. It's better to buy whatever vacuum you feel you like enough to use frequently. That will help keep flooring and furniture in your home looking better and lasting longer. We've been telling you that all along but I guess you don't believe us. Not my problem.
Venson
Venson,
Never mind the numbers (big numbers)... that's funny.
This message was modified Apr 17, 2010 by DysonInventsBig
Never mind the numbers (big numbers)... that is so funny. I guess, low numbers is something your accustomed to.
Hiya DIB,
Paris Hilton's site gets lots of hits but the value in that is also dubious.
How low or high numbers are is a matter of interpretation or spin -- ask the guys in big finance. I think 100,000 of anything stands for a lot but may not mean anything when the issues of volume and actual worth are brought to the table. It also takes more than one individual's "say-so" to prove that. You given no proper stats as to what these numbers represent or amount to on the money end. How many additional and actual Dyson sales did the 100,000 hits lead to?
By the way, you make me laugh too but I wish you did less at your expense.
Never mind the numbers (big numbers)... that is so funny. I guess, low numbers is something your accustomed to.
Hiya DIB,
Paris Hilton's site gets lots of hits but the value in that is also dubious.
How low or high numbers are is a matter of interpretation or spin -- ask the guys in big finance. I think 100,000 of anything stands for a lot but may not mean anything when the issues of volume and actual worth are brought to the table. It also takes more than one individual's "say-so" to prove that. You given no proper stats as to what these numbers represent or amount to on the money end. How many additional and actual Dyson sales did the 100,000 hits lead to?
By the way, you make me laugh too but I wish you did less at your expense.
Venson
.
You win Venson - less is more. Knowing that after yours and Carmines astronomically high posting numbers (far more than all) produces a zero/near zero consumer response is proof of this commitment - less is more.
Dyson Invents Big
This message was modified Apr 17, 2010 by DysonInventsBig
You win Venson - less is more. Knowing that after yours and Carmines astronomically high posting numbers (far more than all) produces a zero/near zero consumer response is proof of this commitment - less is more. Dyson Invents Big
You win Venson - less is more. Knowing that after yours and Carmines astronomically high posting numbers (far more than all) produces a zero/near zero consumer response is proof of this commitment - less is more. Dyson Invents Big
"You always end with a jade's trick. I know you of old."
Venson
I have to admit, I had to look up the definition of a Jades Trick.Well, I’ll just try to remember zero (consumers seeking you out) is greater than the 100,000 views of the DC24 (YouTube video).
Are these below interviews somehow a Jades Trick and/or should they be ignored (by the public)?- If so, please explain the how’s and why’s.
Be careful where this thread goes. It is moving away from the topic towards forum posters.
Moderator
Dude I really don't even care anymore haha. I find this whole thread amusing and interesting, but I found out the Dysons DO have - reportedly - GREAT filtration, and that should be good enough for 99% of the people out there. So I'm fine and happy about that, haha.
Also, for all those who don't believe in Dysons durability, check out these reviews by people who have had them for all well over 6 years, some even 15 years old! http://reviews.argos.co.uk/1493-en_gb/4064389/reviews.htm
