Dysons filtration? Original Message Feb 10, 2010 12:46 pm
How sealed are Dysons? And how good is their filtration? I know the uprights - at least the older, older ones like the DC07 and such might have potential problems with sealing, such as show in this video right here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXA0N0V2uOQ However there could simply be something wrong w/ that one, who knows. BUT ANYWAYS, are the NEWER uprights COMPLETELY sealed? What about their canisters, such as the DC22, 23? Like does any air blow out of the cord reel or such, or ONLY out of the exhaust where it's SUPPOSED to come out from?
The seals that leak are on the sides of the machine on the tubes that run up to the bin there is one on each side,After a while they dry rot from the heat generated by the machine and the dirt blowing at them. Do you know what VITON is???
Or maybe the one that runs up the side of the brushbar housing you know the clear one thats so cheap after 2 years sand blows thru it.
How come the dc18 baby ball sticks to the carpet and does not turn like Sir Jimmy says it should?
The machine is nothing but an overpriced, bagless panasonic, And i like and sell panasonic also And an 99.00 panasonicMC-Ug 581 will last and perform the same way for 5 to 7 years, with a belt and secondary filter change once a year.
Please take your nonsense over the dyson only forum.
Thanks
MOLE
I just have to say that you sir, are VERY wrong about your statements; I know people who've had Dysons for a while and NO dry rotting EVER occures. It's TREATED RUBBER, no dry rot will EVER occur! At least not from small amounts of "heat" from the motor INTAKE, if there even is ANY! I mean, are you serious?! Finally, the technology and quality behind a Dyson is *FAR* better than any Panasonic out there. Don't be ridiculous.
Re: Dysons filtration? Reply #44 Apr 13, 2010 12:12 am
mole wrote:
The seals that leak are on the sides of the machine on the tubes that run up to the bin there is one on each side,After a while they dry rot from the heat generated by the machine and the dirt blowing at them. Do you know what VITON is???
Or maybe the one that runs up the side of the brushbar housing you know the clear one thats so cheap after 2 years sand blows thru it.
How come the dc18 baby ball sticks to the carpet and does not turn like Sir Jimmy says it should?
The machine is nothing but an overpriced, bagless panasonic, And i like and sell panasonic also And an 99.00 panasonicMC-Ug 581 will last and perform the same way for 5 to 7 years, with a belt and secondary filter change once a year.
Please take your nonsense over the dyson only forum.
Thanks
MOLE
Hertz wrote:
I just have to say that you sir, are VERY wrong about your statements; I know people who've had Dysons for a while and NO dry rotting EVER occures. It's TREATED RUBBER, no dry rot will EVER occur! At least not from small amounts of "heat" from the motor INTAKE, if there even is ANY! I mean, are you serious?! Finally, the technology and quality behind a Dyson is *FAR* better than any Panasonic out there. Don't be ridiculous.
Re: Dysons filtration? Reply #45 Apr 13, 2010 12:15 am
mole wrote:
Well exactly how does the fan reverse rotation by taking the upstream seal out. It must be for reverse cooling Is it a 3 channel or 4 channel fan?
Why does dog and human hair lodge in the hepa filter when its suppose to not get by the level3 cyclones, you know the the ones that block within 6 months.
They have a nice long cord though,and kinkless too. I suggest you look for another line of work..........ROOKIE.
MOLE
Only at a conning Dyson competitor will the suction side of a vacuum cleaner blow dust (so-called leak into the environment). Procare’s suction side blows is laughable too.
Re: Dysons filtration? Reply #46 Apr 13, 2010 7:15 am
Hertz wrote:
I just have to say that you sir, are VERY wrong about your statements; I know people who've had Dysons for a while and NO dry rotting EVER occures. It's TREATED RUBBER, no dry rot will EVER occur! At least not from small amounts of "heat" from the motor INTAKE, if there even is ANY! I mean, are you serious?! Finally, the technology and quality behind a Dyson is *FAR* better than any Panasonic out there. Don't be ridiculous.
How sealed are Dysons? And how good is their filtration? I know the uprights - at least the older, older ones like the DC07 and such might have potential problems with sealing, such as show in this video right here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXA0N0V2uOQ However there could simply be something wrong w/ that one, who knows. BUT ANYWAYS, are the NEWER uprights COMPLETELY sealed? What about their canisters, such as the DC22, 23? Like does any air blow out of the cord reel or such, or ONLY out of the exhaust where it's SUPPOSED to come out from?
Having worked on many DC07 and DC14s that are still under warranty, I've concluded that the gaskets which seal the air intake/dirt paths are flimsy for the price of the vacuum. If they have them. [Some of the paths, like the air way U tube/joint have no gasket/seal. Just plastic on plastic.] Soleplate gaskets too, top and bottom? Flimsy, and the cheapest and worse I've ever seen on soleplates on any vacuums in the industry. They lose their shape in short order. All these gasket seals are coated with dust/dirt that leaks out. They are out of shape from their original new condition. They are chintzy and don't hold their form. Period.
Look at the bin holder cavity where the inlet/outlet tubes run up and down a DC07/DC14. Especially after use. Or when you remove to dump the bin. What do you see? Honestly? The whole area is coated with dust and dirt. The more dirt you pack in the bin, the more you'll find on the vacuum behind the bin. Now, check the exhaust filters on any DC07 and 14 dyson vacuums that are used in homes with a pet[s]. What do you find? Honestly? You'll find pet hair. Pet hair passes through the shroud and cyclones all the time on these models. Hopefully the gasket and seal on the exhaust filter housing is tightly fitted. Not loosened from use and movement [common problem], else it won't prevent the hair from leaking out into the room air before getting filtered.
There are design/function shortcomings for these models to have been discontinued. There are valid reasons that all the dyson models that came after these have filter cleaning and maintenance schedules that are halved in time from these. Finally, there are legal reasons that these and other dyson vacuums no longer claim the mantra: Never clogs and never loses suction. They never will again.
Pick your battles to fight and win. DC07 and DC14 are over and done with. They were taken off the market by Sir James and dyson. White flagged. Threw in the towel. Scrubbed completely. They're history now except for the poor buyers and users who got taken in by them.
WRT later dyson models, both canns and uprights after DC07 and DC14, I can't offer any personal and professional experience, YET. Except this observation which I'll share since you asked: While dyson currently offers free asthma and allergy kits on purchases of all new dyson vacuums, it is conspicuously silent and nebulous on the HEPA filtration specs and sealed clean air systems of its line up. This begs the question: Why? Dyson merely says the vacuums are rated asthma and allergy friendly by the BAF. Whatever that means.
Carmine D.
This message was modified Apr 13, 2010 by CarmineD
Location: Scotland UK
Joined: May 31, 2009
Points: 1162
Re: Dysons filtration? Reply #47 Apr 13, 2010 9:31 am
CarmineD wrote:
Pick your battles to fight and win. DC07 and DC14 are over and done with. They were taken off the market by Sir James and dyson. White flagged. Threw in the towel. Scrubbed completely. They're history now except for the poor buyers and users who got taken in by them.
Not so in the UK; the DC14 Origin and DC14 Overdrive are two of the best selling models. They are even on the UK website which shows only current Dyson models that are being sold nationwide.
This message was modified Apr 13, 2010 by vacmanuk
Having worked on many DC07 and DC14s that are still under warranty, I've concluded that the gaskets which seal the air intake/dirt paths are flimsy for the price of the vacuum. If they have them. [Some of the paths, like the air way U tube/joint have no gasket/seal. Just plastic on plastic.] Soleplate gaskets too, top and bottom? Flimsy, and the cheapest and worse I've ever seen on soleplates on any vacuums in the industry. They lose their shape in short order. All these gasket seals are coated with dust/dirt that leaks out. They are out of shape from their original new condition. They are chintzy and don't hold their form. Period.
Look at the bin holder cavity where the inlet/outlet tubes run up and down a DC07/DC14. Especially after use. Or when you remove to dump the bin. What do you see? Honestly? The whole area is coated with dust and dirt. The more dirt you pack in the bin, the more you'll find on the vacuum behind the bin. Now, check the exhaust filters on any DC07 and 14 dyson vacuums that are used in homes with a pet[s]. What do you find? Honestly? You'll find pet hair. Pet hair passes through the shroud and cyclones all the time on these models. Hopefully the gasket and seal on the exhaust filter housing is tightly fitted. Not loosened from use and movement [common problem], else it won't prevent the hair from leaking out into the room air before getting filtered.
There are design/function shortcomings for these models to have been discontinued. There are valid reasons that all the dyson models that came after these have filter cleaning and maintenance schedules that are halved in time from these. Finally, there are legal reasons that these and other dyson vacuums no longer claim the mantra: Never clogs and never loses suction. They never will again.
Pick your battles to fight and win. DC07 and DC14 are over and done with. They were taken off the market by Sir James and dyson. White flagged. Threw in the towel. Scrubbed completely. They're history now except for the poor buyers and users who got taken in by them.
WRT later dyson models, both canns and uprights after DC07 and DC14, I can't offer any personal and professional experience, YET. Except this observation which I'll share since you asked: While dyson currently offers free asthma and allergy kits on purchases of all new dyson vacuums, it is conspicuously silent and nebulous on the HEPA filtration specs and sealed clean air systems of its line up. This begs the question: Why? Dyson merely says the vacuums are rated asthma and allergy friendly by the BAF. Whatever that means.
Carmine D.
I can tell you from first hand observations that the seals are VERY high quality on Dyson machines. I haven't extensively examined the DC07 or 14, but on the 17 the seals are excellent. Yes, there is a small layer of dust on the seal, but nothing OUTSIDE of the seal; no dust re-enters the room, if so, then very little. They're high quality seals that are built to last. Again, I'm not too knowledgeable on the quality of the 07 and 14, but the 17 is a high quality machine that I've used in my own home and it has performed miraculously. One time it even filled the bin damn near to the brim even after vacuuming with my Kirby G4. Yes, you read it correctly. Amazing technology in these machines. Did you know that Dyson spends an average of $300,000 to design the mere BRUSHROLL in their machines? What other company does that? I'm sure there are some, but relatively few I bet. Also, check this link out: http://www.dustfluffgrit.blogspot.com/ Shows about Dysons engineering and research. Again, given that the DC07's and 14's are still available elsewhere in the world, I doubt they're really as flawed as you say. To me it seems as though you're biased, CarmineD.
Having worked on many DC07 and DC14s that are still under warranty, I've concluded that the gaskets which seal the air intake/dirt paths are flimsy for the price of the vacuum. If they have them. [Some of the paths, like the air way U tube/joint have no gasket/seal. Just plastic on plastic.] Soleplate gaskets too, top and bottom? Flimsy, and the cheapest and worse I've ever seen on soleplates on any vacuums in the industry. They lose their shape in short order. All these gasket seals are coated with dust/dirt that leaks out. They are out of shape from their original new condition. They are chintzy and don't hold their form. Period.
Look at the bin holder cavity where the inlet/outlet tubes run up and down a DC07/DC14. Especially after use. Or when you remove to dump the bin. What do you see? Honestly? The whole area is coated with dust and dirt. The more dirt you pack in the bin, the more you'll find on the vacuum behind the bin. Now, check the exhaust filters on any DC07 and 14 dyson vacuums that are used in homes with a pet[s]. What do you find? Honestly? You'll find pet hair. Pet hair passes through the shroud and cyclones all the time on these models. Hopefully the gasket and seal on the exhaust filter housing is tightly fitted. Not loosened from use and movement [common problem], else it won't prevent the hair from leaking out into the room air before getting filtered.
There are design/function shortcomings for these models to have been discontinued. There are valid reasons that all the dyson models that came after these have filter cleaning and maintenance schedules that are halved in time from these. Finally, there are legal reasons that these and other dyson vacuums no longer claim the mantra: Never clogs and never loses suction. They never will again.
Pick your battles to fight and win. DC07 and DC14 are over and done with. They were taken off the market by Sir James and dyson. White flagged. Threw in the towel. Scrubbed completely. They're history now except for the poor buyers and users who got taken in by them.
WRT later dyson models, both canns and uprights after DC07 and DC14, I can't offer any personal and professional experience, YET. Except this observation which I'll share since you asked: While dyson currently offers free asthma and allergy kits on purchases of all new dyson vacuums, it is conspicuously silent and nebulous on the HEPA filtration specs and sealed clean air systems of its line up. This begs the question: Why? Dyson merely says the vacuums are rated asthma and allergy friendly by the BAF. Whatever that means.
Carmine D.
Carmine, stop!You’re embarrassing yourself!
Lets see…you exhibit much Dyson-envy, narcissism and now the traits of a fool.I just decimated and exposed the old-con…Dyson’s leak (spew) dust on the suction side and here you are, 12 hrs later saying Dyson’s spew on the suction side too.It’s over!Your day in the sun (lying to make a buck - lying to a trusting consumer like you did as an independent dealer) is over.Retire already!
I can tell you from first hand observations that the seals are VERY high quality on Dyson machines. I haven't extensively examined the DC07 or 14, but on the 17 the seals are excellent. Yes, there is a small layer of dust on the seal, but nothing OUTSIDE of the seal; no dust re-enters the room, if so, then very little. They're high quality seals that are built to last. Again, I'm not too knowledgeable on the quality of the 07 and 14, but the 17 is a high quality machine that I've used in my own home and it has performed miraculously. One time it even filled the bin damn near to the brim even after vacuuming with my Kirby G4. Yes, you read it correctly. Amazing technology in these machines. Did you know that Dyson spends an average of $300,000 to design the mere BRUSHROLL in their machines? What other company does that? I'm sure there are some, but relatively few I bet. Also, check this link out: http://www.dustfluffgrit.blogspot.com/ Shows about Dysons engineering and research. Again, given that the DC07's and 14's are still available elsewhere in the world, I doubt they're really as flawed as you say. To me it seems as though you're biased, CarmineD.
You asked the question here specifically about the DC07. I answered you with personal and professional proof. As have several others who are still active professionals in the industry. If I [we] don't give you the answer you like and want, and that makes me [us] biased, then so be it. I'm biased toward the truth. As the saying goes, the truth hurts.
Dib-stir, I retired with 55 years in the business to a comfortable life in the Las Vegas blue skies and abundant sunshine. What is your claim to business fame here and anywhere beside spewing the same old dyson how great thou art lines? As I recall you bought your dyson DC15, no longer made and marketed, for $300 on clearance sale years ago.
Carmine D.
This message was modified Apr 13, 2010 by CarmineD
You asked the question here specifically about the DC07. I answered you with personal and professional proof. As have several others who are still active professionals in the industry. If I [we] don't give you the answer you like and want, and that makes me [us] biased, then so be it. I'm biased toward the truth. As the saying goes, the truth hurts.
Carmine D.
No, you merely answered with text. That's not proof in the least. I'm telling you from MY experience that the Dyson seals are of GREAT quality and also letting you know how ridiculous it sounds for someone to mention that they will "dry rot." Foam dry rots, not rubber - at least not the kind Dyson seemingly uses. I'm telling YOU the truth that after multiple years of ownership of a DC17 by a family who uses it frequently (not mine, but a neighbors), and whom haven't even cleaned out the filter after a year or so until I told them about it - not ONE thing has gone wrong with it, it has seen abuse time and again - I even tried somewhat standing on it and it held up FINE, yes I knew that was kind of stupid considering it wasn't even mine, but I did it cautiously :P - and the seals and sole plate are still COMPLETELY intact. Again, I would just say you're biased, unless there's pictorial evidence of your claim.
Is it a 3 channel or 4 channel fan?