Abby's Guide to Vacuum Cleaners
Username Password
Home Discussions Reviews More Guides
Abby’s Guide > Vacuum Cleaners > Discussions > “Anything” Dyson that makes news.

Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Search For:
DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454


Original Message   Jun 28, 2008 12:41 am

Dyson is in the news frequently and so a dedicated thread.

.

This message was modified Aug 2, 2008 by DysonInventsBig



Replies: 388 - 397 of 624Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
Venson


Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900


Reply #388   Dec 10, 2008 10:32 pm
Question . . . Does Dyson staff it own legal team or retain independent attorneys?

Venson
CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894


Reply #389   Dec 11, 2008 7:00 am
Kenneth J, as a poor engineering student, had a US patent on a ball facilitator wheel long before dyson's DC15 Ball [1996 vice 2003].  But Kenneth J had no product.  He lost his case in court in Washington DC on a legal technicality [thanks to a dyson 'hired' legal team that included New York's best and most expensive 3 name lawyers in 3 piece suits].  Samsung will have a few top notch lawyers too.  See what happens when the playing field is level.  In the meantime, the Japanese vacuum market will be a wasteland for dyson.  Japanese people are very loyal to their own.  Extremely so.  What was dyson thinking?

Hello Venson: 

I suspect dyson has both.  A legal counsel/office in house on the payroll and "hired guns" for the court fights.

Carmine D.

This message was modified Dec 11, 2008 by CarmineD
Venson


Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900


Reply #390   Dec 11, 2008 8:48 am
CarmineD wrote:

Hello Venson: 

I suspect dyson has both.  A legal counsel/office in house on the payroll and "hired guns" for the court fights.

Carmine D.


Thanks Carmine,

I've been trying to figure out if these frivolous lawsuits (I see them that way) are cost effective for Dyson.  Then again the only way they can be is by winning.

Samsung is of formidable size and doesn't manufacture vacuums alone.  Its flat-screen TVs are getting good ratings and doing well here in the U.S.  Add in popular cell phones and other electronic devices plus household appliances I too think they'll be able to foot the legal bills.

If I were Dyson, I think I'd spend more time trying to move ahead by improving on what it makes and leave the courts alone.  Maybe the Samsung "Silencio" vac series got 'em upset. By the way . . .

http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/type/type.do?group=homeappliances&type=vacuumcleaner#

Venson
This message was modified Dec 11, 2008 by Venson
HARDSELL


Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293


Reply #391   Dec 11, 2008 9:25 pm
Venson wrote:
Thanks Carmine,

I've been trying to figure out if these frivolous lawsuits (I see them that way) are cost effective for Dyson.  Then again the only way they can be is by winning.

Samsung is of formidable size and doesn't manufacture vacuums alone.  Its flat-screen TVs are getting good ratings and doing well here in the U.S.  Add in popular cell phones and other electronic devices plus household appliances I too think they'll be able to foot the legal bills.

If I were Dyson, I think I'd spend more time trying to move ahead by improving on what it makes and leave the courts alone.  Maybe the Samsung "Silencio" vac series got 'em upset. By the way . . .

http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/type/type.do?group=homeappliances&type=vacuumcleaner#

Venson


Venson,

Better stock up on Samsung products before Dyson gets his share of their money.  Prices of Samsung goods will likely soar. 

CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894


Reply #392   Dec 12, 2008 7:37 am
Hello Venson:

Interestingly, Kenneth J sought legal action against dyson ONLY after his personal petitions to dyson were shunned/ignored.  At least he tried to resolve/settle the matter like a gentleman before seeking court justice [or injustice as the case may be].  Based on the tepid sales response that all the dyson ball models have received in the USA, and the drubbings of DC15 and DC24 at the hands of Consumer Reports [the DC25 has not come up to bat yet in the CR lineup], Kenneth J has definitely received street justice. 

I have to opine that Kenneth J has some personal/professional engineering friends/family at Samsung which despite its total lack of concern about vacuums [with several models of the single stage cyclone variety only], teamed up to file a patent on a triple banger just to bait the litigious dyson into a court room show down.  Knowing full well that regardless of the legal outcome, a lawsuit against Samsung by dyson guarantees that the Japanese vacuum market [the only one for dyson's brushless motor vacuum] will be shut down to all future dyson sales and products.  This hurts dyson more than any one time monetary award against Samsung should dyson win the legal suit.  I'm not sure that a dyson win is a given. 

Then, Kenneth J publishes a book about his legal story.  It will be a best seller.  Mandatory college reading for all US engineering majors and business/economic students.   Have to love the plot:  Unknown US engineering student KO's a world reknown Forbes multi-billionaire company founder/owner over a vacuum ball wheel.  The book's cover will have a picture of a Samsung large screen TV showing James stuck in the mud pushing a ball barrow filled with dyson vacuums. 

Carmine D.

This message was modified Dec 12, 2008 by CarmineD
DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454


Reply #393   Dec 12, 2008 9:04 am
CarmineD wrote:
Hello Venson:

Interestingly, Kenneth J sought legal action against dyson ONLY after his personal petitions to dyson were shunned/ignored.  At least he tried to resolve/settle the matter like a gentleman before seeking court justice [or injustice as the case may be].  Based on the tepid sales response that all the dyson ball models have received in the USA, and the drubbings of DC15 and DC24 at the hands of Consumer Reports [the DC25 has not come up to bat yet in the CR lineup], Kenneth J has definitely received street justice. 

I have to opine that Kenneth J has some personal/professional engineering friends/family at Samsung which despite its total lack of concern about vacuums [with several models of the single stage cyclone variety only], teamed up to file a patent on a triple banger just to bait the litigious dyson into a court room show down.  Knowing full well that regardless of the legal outcome, a lawsuit against Samsung by dyson guarantees that the Japanese vacuum market [the only one for dyson's brushless motor vacuum] will be shut down to all future dyson sales and products.  This hurts dyson more than any one time monetary award against Samsung should dyson win the legal suit.  I'm not sure that a dyson win is a given. 

Then, Kenneth J publishes a book about his legal story.  It will be a best seller.  Mandatory college reading for all US engineering majors and business/economic students.   Have to love the plot:  Unknown US engineering student KO's a world reknown Forbes multi-billionaire company founder/owner over a vacuum ball wheel.  The book's cover will have a picture of a Samsung large screen TV showing James stuck in the mud pushing a ball barrow filled with dyson vacuums. 

Carmine D.


... pure fiction.


HARDSELL


Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293


Reply #394   Dec 12, 2008 9:58 am
DysonInventsBig wrote:
... pure fiction.


Typical of Carmine.
M00seUK


Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295


Reply #395   Dec 12, 2008 10:23 am
DysonInventsBig wrote:
... pure fiction.

Hrmm... creative, to say the least!
DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454


Reply #396   Dec 12, 2008 4:17 pm
Venson wrote:
Thanks Carmine,

I've been trying to figure out if these frivolous lawsuits (I see them that way) are cost effective for Dyson.  Then again the only way they can be is by winning.

Samsung is of formidable size and doesn't manufacture vacuums alone.  Its flat-screen TVs are getting good ratings and doing well here in the U.S.  Add in popular cell phones and other electronic devices plus household appliances I too think they'll be able to foot the legal bills.

If I were Dyson, I think I'd spend more time trying to move ahead by improving on what it makes and leave the courts alone.  Maybe the Samsung "Silencio" vac series got 'em upset. By the way . . .

http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/type/type.do?group=homeappliances&type=vacuumcleaner#

Venson

Venson,

To date, Dyson has not sued any manufacturer “that did not have it coming”.  Dyson has won every lawsuit (proved theft) against manufacturers who are much older and much richer (than Dyson).  If they did not steal, Dyson would not sue.

It is pathetic to see these much older manufacturers and some are worth multi-billions take “what is not theirs”, from the puny and young (by comparison) $1-$1.5b, 15 year old Dyson LTD.

DIB
This message was modified Dec 12, 2008 by DysonInventsBig



DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454


Reply #397   Dec 12, 2008 5:31 pm
CarmineD wrote:
Kenneth J, as a poor engineering student, had a US patent on a ball facilitator wheel long before dyson's DC15 Ball [1996 vice 2003].  But Kenneth J had no product.  He lost his case in court in Washington DC on a legal technicality [thanks to a dyson 'hired' legal team that included New York's best and most expensive 3 name lawyers in 3 piece suits].  Samsung will have a few top notch lawyers too.  See what happens when the playing field is level.  In the meantime, the Japanese vacuum market will be a wasteland for dyson.  Japanese people are very loyal to their own.  Extremely so.  What was dyson thinking?

Hello Venson: 

I suspect dyson has both.  A legal counsel/office in house on the payroll and "hired guns" for the court fights.

Carmine D.


Carmine,

Just curious...   How did you arrive at your “level playing field” conclusion?  Samsung sales exceed $100b (min) v. Dyson sales of $1.5b.  Samsung is a monster by comparison.

FYI:  Samsung has amassed the worlds largest low/high efficacy cyclonic filtration patents (pending).  Certainly an attempt to out-spend the smaller competitors and an attempt to monopolize cyclonic filtration.

Level Playing field? - Hardly.  It's much more like out of kilter!

DIB

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Electronics
This message was modified Dec 12, 2008 by DysonInventsBig



Replies: 388 - 397 of 624Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
Vacuum Cleaners Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.
Site by Take 42