Abby's Guide to Vacuum Cleaners
Username Password
Home Discussions Reviews More Guides
Abby’s Guide > Vacuum Cleaners > Discussions > Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum

Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Search For:
CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Original Message   Jun 4, 2009 1:02 pm
New lightweight with OBT in town for $250 with free bags for life and zero cost maintenance warranty for life.  Anything goes wrong, a new vacuun is shipped to you.  

http://www.garryvac.com/

Taking a page from ORECK on the giveaways:  Free Steam Mop to keep if not satisfied with purchase and returned.

https://www.garryvacuum.com/order_form.html?country=CA

Comments?

Carmine D.

This message was modified Jun 4, 2009 by CarmineD
Replies: 69 - 78 of 96Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
HARDSELL


Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #69   Dec 20, 2009 9:23 am
CarmineD wrote:
My observation too SEVERUS.  These homeowners are the ORECK brand's bread and butter.  Interesting too that the XL21 comes with the longest ORECK warranty: 20 years.   ORECK is first class in honoring this warranty and serving these customers as well as they possibly can.

Carmine D.


Severus wrote:
I was visiting a open house in an upscale area of town.  There was a 3000sf home with a combination of wood floors, tile, and low pile carpeting (looked almost like commercial carpeting with a nice design), and lo and behold inside the hall closet was an Oreck XL21.   For this type of flooring, the Oreck is a pretty good match. 

I frequently visit a very close relative who has a 9,000 + sq ft home.  He has very expensive tile, wood and carpet.  Not the commercial grade i/o looking stuff.  Also lots of expensive area rugs.  They use a Dyson rather than the built in vac.  No Orecks in a reall upscale house.

All that you said about the Oreck Carmine does not relate to cleaning performance.

This message was modified Dec 20, 2009 by HARDSELL
HARDSELL


Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #70   Dec 20, 2009 9:31 am
CarmineD wrote:
HS:

I really think you are disappointed and/or sad that your sold your DC07 [supposedly its signature model by your account] and its discontinued now never to be made and sold again.  You're having seller's remorse.  You compensate for your poor judgement by attacking ORECK and HOOVER, both brands with their signature models [Classic and WT] still sold pervasively at retailers and stores.

If it makes you feel worse, ORECK now is also gifting a toy ORECK vacuum with all purchases starting Dec 19.  Gotta get me at least one of those for the grands.  In my experience, it's an ORECK first.

Carmine D.



Carmine,  I have no disappointments or remorse about selling the DC07.  Unlike you I used the Oreck prior to the DC07 and was sadly disappointed in the Oreck.  You OTH criticized Dyson long before owning one.  I suppose that preconceived idea was in part a reason you did not like your DC07.  You started personal attacks on Dyson without ever using one.  I did have experience before defending the Dyson.  Of course noe of the manufacturers have ever damaged my back side as Dyson did yours.

Maybe a first to give a free toy with the toys that they sell.

CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #71   Dec 20, 2009 2:51 pm
HARDSELL wrote:
Carmine,  I have no disappointments or remorse about selling the DC07.  Unlike you I used the Oreck prior to the DC07 and was sadly disappointed in the Oreck.  You OTH criticized Dyson long before owning one.  I suppose that preconceived idea was in part a reason you did not like your DC07.  You started personal attacks on Dyson without ever using one.  I did have experience before defending the Dyson.  Of course noe of the manufacturers have ever damaged my back side as Dyson did yours.

Maybe a first to give a free toy with the toys that they sell.



HS:

If your highlighted statement is true, then I believe you were not all that impressed with dyson's DC07.  After all, one does not sell their treasures, let alone their assets without good reasons.  

BTW, I owned and used dyson's DC07 long before the ORECK Classic.  Dyson didn't work on my carpets.  Gawdawful clutch and floating head are not what wool medium pile carpets call for.  Went for a new ORECK thanks in large part to your bad mouthing.  Having been in the business, tho never selling new ORECK's, I was always impressed by the compliments that ORECK customers had for their ORECK's.  So I was surprised by your attacks of it.  So when I had the opportunity I bought one for $150.  ORECK works fine and has for over 2 years.  In fact I bought 3 more just like it.  You keep what works and you like using and share with others.  If I can finagle a toy ORECK for the grands then what more can I ask for Christmas.

Carmine D. 

Severus


If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...

Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #72   Dec 21, 2009 3:41 pm
HARDSELL wrote:
I frequently visit a very close relative who has a 9,000 + sq ft home.  He has very expensive tile, wood and carpet.  Not the commercial grade i/o looking stuff.  Also lots of expensive area rugs.  They use a Dyson rather than the built in vac.  No Orecks in a reall upscale house.

All that you said about the Oreck Carmine does not relate to cleaning performance.



Hardsell,

Wow - 9000 sf.    Are you related to a country music star or Al Gore? 

The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable.  The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking. 
HARDSELL


Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #73   Dec 21, 2009 4:42 pm
CarmineD wrote:
HS:

If your highlighted statement is true, then I believe you were not all that impressed with dyson's DC07.  After all, one does not sell their treasures, let alone their assets without good reasons.  

BTW, I owned and used dyson's DC07 long before the ORECK Classic.  Dyson didn't work on my carpets.  Gawdawful clutch and floating head are not what wool medium pile carpets call for.  Went for a new ORECK thanks in large part to your bad mouthing.  Having been in the business, tho never selling new ORECK's, I was always impressed by the compliments that ORECK customers had for their ORECK's.  So I was surprised by your attacks of it.  So when I had the opportunity I bought one for $150.  ORECK works fine and has for over 2 years.  In fact I bought 3 more just like it.  You keep what works and you like using and share with others.  If I can finagle a toy ORECK for the grands then what more can I ask for Christmas.

Carmine D. 


I do not consider a vacuum to be a treasure or an asset.  It is simply another tool around the house.  They are simply a hobby to pass time.  I was and still am impressed with the DC07. At least as impressed as I can be with a vacuum.  I bought a new Electrolux in 1973 which I am sure is still worth more than the DC07.  Still no regrets.

I once owned a car (1968) that was one of 476 built that year.  It had no special value back then.  Today they sell for upwards of half a million and are not as rare as the one I owned.  I do have regrets of selling that one. 

I don't know the difference in your medium pile and mine, however the DC07 never had a clutch problem after 3 years of use.  I did use the DC07 on some expensive wool carpet in an elderly aunts home with no problem.

You might be surprised at what isn't working if you did a deep cleaning.

Anyway,  a MERRY CHRISTMAS  to you and the family. 

May God bless all.

CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #74   Dec 21, 2009 7:09 pm
HARDSELL wrote:
I do not consider a vacuum to be a treasure or an asset.  It is simply another tool around the house.  They are simply a hobby to pass time.  I was and still am impressed with the DC07. At least as impressed as I can be with a vacuum.  I bought a new Electrolux in 1973 which I am sure is still worth more than the DC07.  Still no regrets.

I once owned a car (1968) that was one of 476 built that year.  It had no special value back then.  Today they sell for upwards of half a million and are not as rare as the one I owned.  I do have regrets of selling that one. 

I don't know the difference in your medium pile and mine, however the DC07 never had a clutch problem after 3 years of use.  I did use the DC07 on some expensive wool carpet in an elderly aunts home with no problem.

You might be surprised at what isn't working if you did a deep cleaning.

Anyway,  a MERRY CHRISTMAS  to you and the family. 

May God bless all.


HS:

And therein is the difference.  A good tool is an asset never to be lent or borrowed.  In my business more vacuums were in need of repair after lending and borrowing.  Not a wise practice.

Learned today that grand baby number 4 is on the way.  Grand daughter number 3 broke the Dirt Devil toy vacuum handle last night after it survived her two older sisters for more than 3 years.  A new toy ORECK is needed for sure now.

Merry Christmas to you and yours. 

Carmine D.

CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #75   Dec 22, 2009 6:46 am
Severus wrote:
Hardsell,

Wow - 9000 sf.    Are you related to a country music star or Al Gore? 



 Too funny SEVERUS!  

Carmine D. 

CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #76   Dec 22, 2009 6:56 am
HS:

BTW, I have upgraded rug padding which in concert with the looped medium wool pile was a disaster for dyson's DC07.  The brush bar stalled constantly and the ratcheting noise drove the dog and Wife out of the house.   Dyson's HELPLINE admitted that a dyson would not work after several workarounds, removing the soleplate upper and lower gaskets, and told me to return it.  Not even buy another dyson.  [September 2006] I also mentioned that the builder's rug contractor gave similar warnings at a homeowners meeting about 3 weeks after I made the dyson purchase.  Our community has about 2400 houses in the community and many went with upgraded carpeting and padding.  The homeowners who did and bought/gifted dysons had the same problems.

BTW, FYI, I received a tax assessment from the county.  For the 2 straight year, my property taxes in Las Vegas have been lowered due to decline in home/land values.

Carmine D.

CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #77   Dec 22, 2009 7:27 pm
HARDSELL wrote:
I do not consider a vacuum to be a treasure or an asset.  It is simply another tool around the house.  They are simply a hobby to pass time.  I was and still am impressed with the DC07. At least as impressed as I can be with a vacuum.  I bought a new Electrolux in 1973 which I am sure is still worth more than the DC07.  Still no regrets.

I once owned a car (1968) that was one of 476 built that year.  It had no special value back then.  Today they sell for upwards of half a million and are not as rare as the one I owned.  I do have regrets of selling that one. 

I don't know the difference in your medium pile and mine, however the DC07 never had a clutch problem after 3 years of use.  I did use the DC07 on some expensive wool carpet in an elderly aunts home with no problem.

You might be surprised at what isn't working if you did a deep cleaning.

Anyway,  a MERRY CHRISTMAS  to you and the family. 

May God bless all.


HS:

There is a very simple and easy process to determine if your vacuum is deep down cleaning.  Even you can do it.  Venson has posted this before here so he gets the credit.  You get down on your knees up close and personal with your rugs/carpets.  You separate the pile with your fingers and look at the rug backing.  If it's clean with no dirt and debris imbedded at the bottom of the pile, your vacuum is working properly and doing its job.  Repeat the process on different areas of your rugs and carpets to inspect the results.  If you find dirt and debris there, it's time to get started vacuuming and/or opt for a vacuum that works properly.

Carmine D.

This message was modified Dec 22, 2009 by CarmineD
Severus


If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...

Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397

Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #78   Dec 23, 2009 11:04 pm
CarmineD wrote:
HS:

There is a very simple and easy process to determine if your vacuum is deep down cleaning.  Even you can do it.  Venson has posted this before here so he gets the credit.  You get down on your knees up close and personal with your rugs/carpets.  You separate the pile with your fingers and look at the rug backing.  If it's clean with no dirt and debris imbedded at the bottom of the pile, your vacuum is working properly and doing its job.  Repeat the process on different areas of your rugs and carpets to inspect the results.  If you find dirt and debris there, it's time to get started vacuuming and/or opt for a vacuum that works properly.

Carmine D.



HS,

If you're feeling lonely, another option is to call up the local Rainbow salesman and get a "free" demo.  They'll be glad to vacuum your rugs.  It's actually quite fun if you have a good vacuum, and they fail to get anything significant out of your rugs.   The Rainbow salesman was very frustrated when he visited.   The SOB actually did something to try to sabotage my vacuum bag. 

The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable.  The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking. 
Replies: 69 - 78 of 96Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
Vacuum Cleaners Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.
Site by Take 42