Abby's Guide to Vacuum Cleaners
Username Password
Home Discussions Reviews More Guides

Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Search For:
DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454

no subject
Original Message   Sep 20, 2007 8:06 pm

This message was modified Oct 23, 2007 by DysonInventsBig



Replies: 11 - 15 of 15Next page of topicsPreviousAllView as Outline
Venson


Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900

Re: James Dyson >>> There goes the neighborhood - LG Cyclone DynaClean
Reply #11   Sep 24, 2007 7:52 pm
Hello all,

I may have missed the mention, but the LG DynaClean is the machine the Kenmore Progressive bagless canister was cloned from.  This machine was also known as the Iridium. Some of the DynaCleans fancier features -- I recall it had the ability to "talk" and silver oxide as a bacterial deterent in the plastic its dust collection bin was made of -- were left behind along with the DynaClean's hose and power nozzle design.  The Progressive Bagless nonetheless possessed a number of features I liked and made itself all the likeable by way of somewhat lesser price.

I own one and have found it to be a most satisfactory performer.  Although it could use just a slight trimming down sizewise, it is the first bagless machine that I've not minded dealing with come time for emptying.  There are only two actual filters used in this machine which makes it all the more amazing to me that with a wash-out now and then of the dust collection bin and a sensible emptying routine the pre-filter only presents minimal amounts of dust.  That kind of science is good enough for me. I have not developed a great interest for Dysons and think it's most unfortunate that for whatever reason the Progressive Bagless was not allowed to live as far as the market is concerned.

Regarding who owes what to whom, I think the Dyson did its share of borrowing for the Fantom upright design.

Regards,

Venson

DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454

no subject
Reply #12   Sep 25, 2007 3:19 pm
This message was modified Oct 23, 2007 by DysonInventsBig



Moderator Mike_W


"There is no BEST or PERFECT vacuum cleaner"

"Take care of your vacuum, then your vacuum will take care of you"


Joined: Dec 1, 2004
Points: 1683

Re: James Dyson >>> There goes the neighborhood - LG Cyclone DynaClean
Reply #13   Sep 25, 2007 4:44 pm
The Kenmore Progressive Iridium is a vacuum cleaner made by LG Electronics.  The vacuum was first marketed in Europe and then to the United States.  The Kenmore does have some modifictions for the US market(hose, wand, power nozzle,etc.).  I have found that the vacuum cleaner performs very well. 

If a vacuum cleaner is made smaller, then the bag compartment must also be made smaller.  This translates into more trips to the trashcan for emptying.  Having to make more trips to the trash may deter some from making this vacuum cleaner purchase.  So, I believe that the Iridium is a decent size for a full sized vacuum cleaner.  It is much harder to design a bagless dirt container than to design a bag compartment of a bagged cleaner.

 

This message was modified Sep 25, 2007 by Mike_W
DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454

no subject
Reply #14   Sep 25, 2007 5:20 pm
This message was modified Oct 23, 2007 by DysonInventsBig



Hertz


Joined: Jan 31, 2010
Points: 199

Re: James Dyson >>> There goes the neighborhood - LG Cyclone DynaClean
Reply #15   Aug 6, 2010 10:17 pm
Venson wrote:
Hello all,

I may have missed the mention, but the LG DynaClean is the machine the Kenmore Progressive bagless canister was cloned from.  This machine was also known as the Iridium. Some of the DynaCleans fancier features -- I recall it had the ability to "talk" and silver oxide as a bacterial deterent in the plastic its dust collection bin was made of -- were left behind along with the DynaClean's hose and power nozzle design.  The Progressive Bagless nonetheless possessed a number of features I liked and made itself all the likeable by way of somewhat lesser price.

I own one and have found it to be a most satisfactory performer.  Although it could use just a slight trimming down sizewise, it is the first bagless machine that I've not minded dealing with come time for emptying.  There are only two actual filters used in this machine which makes it all the more amazing to me that with a wash-out now and then of the dust collection bin and a sensible emptying routine the pre-filter only presents minimal amounts of dust.  That kind of science is good enough for me. I have not developed a great interest for Dysons and think it's most unfortunate that for whatever reason the Progressive Bagless was not allowed to live as far as the market is concerned.

Regarding who owes what to whom, I think the Dyson did its share of borrowing for the Fantom upright design.

Regards,

Venson



Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but Fantom LICENSED its technology FROM Dyson.
Replies: 11 - 15 of 15Next page of topicsPreviousAllView as Outline
Vacuum Cleaners Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.
Site by Take 42