Abby's Guide to Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more)
Username Password
Discussions Reviews More Guides
Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection

Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions

Search For:
Electrocutor


Joined: Nov 7, 2010
Points: 14

Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Original Message   Nov 7, 2010 2:36 am
Greetings:

I'd like some help in ironing out specifics on snowblowers and the components that make them up (and make up their engines). I have collected some data from various places, but it seems that the manufacturers are VERY against disclosing any of the nitty-gritty details about the make-up of the snowblowers (which seems silly). I'd like to limit the thread to high quality construct (meaning at or near comercial grade) 24" or 28" 2010 snowblowers to try to keep things moving forward if possible. I'll start by listed information I've gathered on the two models I am looking at most currently. If you have any confirmed factual information, please post it; but I'd like to try to stay away from unconfirmed opinions or personal experience arguments if possible.

Ariens Platinum 24 (921017)
[Engine: Briggs & Stratton 1150]
- Moderate Fuel Efficiency *F
- Torque: 11.5 ft-lbs (SAE J1940) *WARNING: Class action lawsuit against B&S (and others including Honda) for creating a false standard J1940 to conceal horsepower fraud, so this number has no real-world value. Can anyone get a real number for this please, perhaps in SAE 1349 standard? Honda has corrected their HP/Torque ratings on their website, but B&S hasn't yet.  *D, *E
- Type: OHV *D
- Crankshaft: Ball Bearing  *Snowmann, *slinger

[Gearbox: SX Aluminum]
- Steel Worm Gear *G
- Bronze sleeve bearing *G (for sleeve), *Snowmann (for material)

[Movement: Drive Disc]
- Automatic Traction Control / Quick Turn *C
- Bronze Sleeve Bearing *G

[Auger]
- Serated *C
- Nylon Sleeve Bearing *G
- 14" *C

[Impeller]
- 14" *C

[Accessories]
- Light *C
- 120V Start *C
- Hand Warmer *C

[MSR]
- $1599 *C

Honda (HS724WA)
[Engine: GX200]
- Superior Fuel Efficiency *F
- Torque: 9.1 ft-lbs @ 2,500 rpm (SAE J1349 International Standard) *B
- Type: OHV *B
- Counter-Vibration *B
- Noise Reduction *B
- Crankshaft: Ball Bearing *A

[Gearbox]
- Steel Helical Gears *A
- Steel Ball Bearing *A

[Movement: Hydrostatic]
- Infinitely Variable *A
- Fixed 2wd *A

[Auger]
- Serated *A
- 14" *trouts2

[Impeller]
- 12" *trouts2

[MSR]
- $2299 *A

Notes
- SAE J1349 assumes 15% loss of power to internal friction; in reality, this is just an average and varies per engine (so less internal friction would mean the actual HP is higher) *this can be validated at any site that defines the SAE 1349 standard

Sources
- A : Honda Snowblower Specifications (http://www.hondapowerequipment.com/products/snowblowers/content.aspx?asset=sb_whychoose) (http://www.hondapowerequipment.com/products/modeldetail.aspx?page=modeldetail&section=P2SB&modelname=HS724WA&modelid=HS724WA)
- B: Honda Engine Specifications (http://engines.honda.com/models/model-detail/gx200)
- C: Ariens Specifications (http://www.ariens.com/products_snow/s_deluxe_platinum_group/s_deluxe_platinum_24/Pages/default.aspx)
- D: Briggs & Stratton Specifications (http://www.briggsandstratton.com/engines/other-engines/detail.aspx?series=1150+Series&id=%7BB8CACFAE-E522-4511-88F6-9DA80E1C1ADC%7D)
- E: Class-Action Engine HP Fraud Lawsuit (http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Lawnmower_Horsepower_Fraud) *there are many other references, just google
- F: Personally inferred from many (>20) personal forum posts by different owners
- G: Ariens Parts Catalog (http://partsradar.arinet.com/scripts/EmpartISAPI.dll?MF&app=ariens&lang=EN&TF=Empartweb&loginID=ariensc&loginpwd=consumer)

*I can't seem to find the link to the online Honda parts catalog again (it was hard to find and I didn't bookmark it). If anyone finds it, please post the URL

This message was modified Nov 7, 2010 by Electrocutor
Replies: 28 - 37 of 45Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
snowmachine


Location: Washington State
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Points: 268

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #28   Nov 7, 2010 9:59 pm
Electrocutor wrote:
Thank you, snowmachine, for that bit of information; I didn't know that Husqvarna and its child brands were not being sold in the US this year. Thus far, you were the only helpful poster.


I should clarify. Huskys are being sold in US but Sears isn't selling any rebranded models as Craftsmans in the US.
aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #29   Nov 7, 2010 11:07 pm
Electrocutor wrote:
I agree that opinions of real-world use is very important, but there are tons of other posts about that. What I failed to find no matter where I looked was a quantitative comparison and detailed analytical comparison of different like-machines components and construction practices. One thing that has become abundantly clear is that for every component that has been improved in the last 30 years, 3 components are now made less durable or from cheaper quality and build materials/design than they used to be. The problem is that no one knows this kind of info except the engineers that designed it (who aren't allowed to reveal that info) and people who have dug into the workings.

This is a fact of life, our resources are limited, and people expect more for their money, as well as higher wages and salaries, and benefits.  How is this sustainable?  If you don't like it, don't shop at walmart, costco, or any store that has foreign made products.  Go work for companies that believe and practice in doing business with people here.  Resist the temptation that to be competitive, you have to go offshore.  What goes around comes around.

I guess I was hoping for more actual information from people and less having to defend myself for asking how well something is built. I just assumed that everyone would have thought knowing the construction quality of a machine was just as important as knowing how well the users like it.

Why should you feel you have to defend yourself?  Who's holding you accountable for how well something is constructed? 

Never assume that what you think is important is the same as everyone else.  Not everyone can be like you, the world needs different kinds of people to function properly.

This message was modified Nov 7, 2010 by aa335
aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #30   Nov 7, 2010 11:47 pm
Electrocutor wrote:

From all users opinions and reports of maintnance that I've read thus far, the Hondas and Ariens' Platinum line are in direct competition, with the Honda having a name premium, quieter operation, and hydro drive, and the Ariens having cheaper replacement parts, more accessories, and quick-turn/auto-traction. That said, a couple of the parts on the Honda seem to be universally viewed as superior (f.e. the Helical gearbox vs Worm). I'm torn between the two; and I don't have enough information about the other brands to do comparisons with their equivilent models.

Please help?


Hmm...direct competition between Honda and Ariens?  Each one has quite different business model and customer base.  Care to elaborate on why you think they are in direct competition?

I don't know what you mean when you said helical gearbox versus worm.   Why so torn?

What is your overall goal?  To make an informed decision for your own purchase of a "snowblower" or to provide "harvested" information to others to make an informed decision?  I think people are quite capable of harvesting information on their own to make informed decision on a multitudes of models, why limit themselves with just two of the Ariens and Honda models you selected?
This message was modified Nov 7, 2010 by aa335
aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #31   Nov 7, 2010 11:58 pm
Shryp wrote:
Come on guys.  We know this is not David from NJ.  He would have started a separate topic for each subfunction check.

Give it some time.  It's only day one.  :)

I think we should start a BINGO game.   Make your own subfunctions on a sheet of paper, like hydrostatic transmission, differential, auger diameter, impeller diameter, orange bucket, red bucket, green bucket , black bucket.....  But don't use these, make up our own and be creative.  First one to get all in a row wins.  :)
This message was modified Nov 8, 2010 by aa335
aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #32   Nov 8, 2010 12:16 am
jrtrebor wrote:
I think the choice is pretty simple.  If you have the money to spend, buy a Honda.  If not buy an Ariens.

"Durability (low rate of part replacement), efficiency, and longevity are primary concerns"
Those three relate directly to factors you should be considering.  How big an area will be clearing per use.  What type of snow do usually get, wet, dry?  How much snow do you get in a season.  On average how many inches per event.  How quickly do you want to remove the snow each time.
A 10hp will clear more snow than a 5hp in the same amount of time.  The Ariens and the Honda are both good machine.  But your specific needs and your average annual snow fall are bigger factors in making your choice than all of the blower specs.

 I live in Mi. and sometimes have to deal with drifts 30" deep. I wouldn't have anything smaller than 10Hp.  You can wear out even a good machine.  If you continually use it for all it's worth time and time again.

Man, I thought it was simple until I read this:

"Clearing surface is unimportant: it is possible/likely that I will someday move and bring my quality snow-blower with me. The goal is to not buy 'junk' that will need fixing and replacing parts every 3-5 years: once upon a time things were made to last, that is no longer the case and you must take care to investigate how things are built nowadays to obtain the same quality of prduct."

Any sales person here care to share how you would approach this customer?
FrankMA


Location: Merrimack Valley/Northeastern Mass
Joined: Jul 1, 2010
Points: 587

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #33   Nov 8, 2010 5:37 am
aa335 wrote:
Man, I thought it was simple until I read this:

"Clearing surface is unimportant: it is possible/likely that I will someday move and bring my quality snow-blower with me. The goal is to not buy 'junk' that will need fixing and replacing parts every 3-5 years: once upon a time things were made to last, that is no longer the case and you must take care to investigate how things are built nowadays to obtain the same quality of prduct."

Any sales person here care to share how you would approach this customer?

The only tact you can take with a customer/person like this, is to explain why your product is better. Point by point identify each of those major and critical components that make your product stand out and explain why this is the case, i.e. why the construction is important, ergonomics, quality of building materials, etc... This education/cost justification is usually to no avail as people who tend to overthink decisions such as this just can't justify the higher end purchase because it is not pefect or engineered to the Nth degree (in their mind). Doing your homework is fine and is a prudent decision but going overboard nitpicking every nut and bolt is another story. I usually politely remind them that you get what you pay for and walk away. There's no sense wasting your time...

Toro Wheel Horse 522xi GT, Honda HS928TA, Honda HS621AS, Honda HS520A, Toro CCR3000 (work in progress), Honda HS624WA (sold 08/23/2010), Stihl BR550 Backpack Blower, Stihl MS250, McCulloch MS1635, Honda EM6500SX Generator
Electrocutor


Joined: Nov 7, 2010
Points: 14

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #34   Nov 8, 2010 9:16 am
For anyone else who has been reading this thread, after doing some more research on my own (I've put in well over 150 hours of research now), I decided to go with either the Honda hs724wa or hs928was depending on whether or not the dealer thinks the electric start is necessary (the hs724 has much better fuel economy if you don't need the extra horsepower). I made this decision from further researching of the building quality of the machine. It looks like had I decided to purchase a snowblower a few years back, I'd have had a better selection, but as it is now the majority of blowers are more or less built similar for each of their respective 'lines' or 'series' except for Yamaha (which aren't available in the US) and Honda (Husqvarna may be as well from what I found, but I couldn't find enough details on the Husqvarnas to be conclusive). There are a number of improvements that other brands have put into play on newer models (which are very convenient), but the overall workmanship of their units has degraded over the past several years (mostly due to the companies being bought out I think). These two (three) seem to be built as sturdy as the older generations of Ariens, Toro, etc.

I'm sorry this didn't turn out as I had wanted to provide other people looking for information about the different brands with what they needed to make their decisions, but regardless of which brand you decide to go with, keep in mind of one major thing: the manufacturers of today make tons of different models for a reason: they skimp on quality of the lower-line products in order to lower production cost and provide a 'budget' machine, but be aware that you are far more likely to have to do repairs, buy replacement parts, and replace the machine much more often on their lesser series. With Honda, they only offer their top-of-line (and offer the full 3 year warranty for comercial use unlike the other brands); for Ariens, I personally would not purchase their units below the Platinum line. I don't have enough information on the other brands to be able to determine which series start their higher quality builds.

aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #35   Nov 8, 2010 9:54 am
Congrats on deciding on the HS724, it is IMO, one of the finest built 24" snowblower today, although not the strongest or the gutsiest.  But I'm sure that's not your primary concern.  Your choice is the best choice for yourself, simple, everybody has their angle.  Most manufacturers typically do not make high end 24", limited customer base.  IMO, that is only met by Honda, Yamaha, and Simplicity.

If you value maneuverability, compactness, and build quality, the 724 fills these requirement exactly.  It is a beautiful machine, kind like Wall-e with a bucket and handles.  :)  You can see attention to details like cable management, clean welds, straightforward and convenient choke/throttle, engine shutoff placement, and nice rubber coated handle levers, with just the right amount of cable tension and minimal slack.  Try playing around with John Deere high-end 1330SE handles and levers for comparison and make up your own conclusion.

In reply to your comment about manufacturers skimping on quality and offering budget models, I wouldn't place the burden of responsibility solely on manufacturers and creative sales force.  Supply meets demand.  Consumers are buying lower priced models expecting it to be feature rich and you will see more of it.  You can be active and vote for people in office that represents your goals and needs, or you can just sit back and complain.  I digress, but hope you get the idea.

Sorry if this thread doesn't go in the direction you wanted it to.  Your questions are loaded and people here just don't have the answers that you expect.  People here offer their opinions and experiences, not as an engineer, but as a consumer/user/modders, ect...
The best you can do is take the normal distribution curve as common and useful opinions/fact and disregard the two extreme tail ends, for statistical sake.

Be sure to post pictures of your new toy.  This forum is in shortage of new shiny Honda snowblowers. :)
This message was modified Nov 8, 2010 by aa335
Electrocutor


Joined: Nov 7, 2010
Points: 14

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #36   Nov 8, 2010 11:14 am
aa335 wrote:
Be sure to post pictures of your new toy.  This forum is in shortage of new shiny Honda snowblowers. :)


I don't own a camera (never had need for photos), so I won't be able to do that. The dealer said the most expensive part of the Hondas compared to other brands is the shipping to get them; they have to order them in bulk or have to pay a ridiculous amount on shipping (compared to the Ariens and Deeres they also sell). He is going to see if he can get mine ordered alongside a shipment of generators to see if he can cut down the shipping costs that he would have to pass on to me.

As of 2004, Simplicity is no longer Simplicity. John Deere this year are no longer green-painted Ariens, they are green-painted Murray, which are Briggs, just like the newer Simplicity.

This message was modified Nov 8, 2010 by Electrocutor
aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #37   Nov 8, 2010 11:52 am
How much would that shipping cost be if he pass it on to you?  Smells like fish to me.
Replies: 28 - 37 of 45Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.
Site by Take 42