Abby's Guide to Vacuum Cleaners
Username Password
Home Discussions Reviews More Guides
Abby’s Guide > Vacuum Cleaners > Discussions > The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction

Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Search For:
DysonIsOverrated


Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Points: 2

The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Original Message   Sep 25, 2007 10:54 am
Technically, the Rainbow vacuum was the first to not lose suction.  It uses a more primitive dual cyclone design with water as a pre-filter.   If the Rainbow didn't have such a ridiculously high price and clumsy power nozzle, it would be a pretty good vacuum.  I don't know why they require you to hold a button down to keep the power nozzle operating.  One would think that they would use a simple 2-way switch.  All that on/off cycling can't possibly be good for the power nozzle motor.   The Rainbow uses an innovative brushless motor.  It would be a pretty good $800 vacuum with a better power nozzle. 
Replies: 17 - 26 of 31Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454

no subject
Reply #17   Oct 8, 2007 2:05 pm
This message was modified Oct 23, 2007 by DysonInventsBig



Venson


Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #18   Oct 8, 2007 9:01 pm
Thanks DIB!  Now we don't have to take Mark's apart.  In any event this constitutes more interesting science.  I'd love to see one of these motors au natural but hope that doesn't mean having to pay for the experience.

Thanks again,

Venson

mark40511


Joined: Oct 4, 2007
Points: 37

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #19   Oct 9, 2007 1:15 am
Well....I've been curious to see what the hepa looks like anyway and I've looked at it closely...it still looks and smells very clean.. I've has this rainbow 1 yr and 3 mos..I have used it atleast 30 times..My house is wall to wall berber and tile in bathrooms 1300 sq feet home. Granted I change the water every 20 minutes..I may go a tad longer but the water has been at worst dark mop water...,mostly just cloudy with cat hair in it...I'm telling ya....I can tell a difference in how long the house stays clean..I'm a neat freak and a clean freak...If I use the regular Kenmore..It does a good job...But I'm trying to figure out if this water is not filtering the dirt like some say and it's bouncing off the water wouldn't the hepa be NASTY???? I mean it's a sealed system..all the air comes straight out of that hepa.
mole


.

Location: earth
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Points: 783

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #20   Oct 9, 2007 9:18 am
Thanks Guy's for the information,could this be the differences between the e2 and the e2 2speed machine,so the e2- 2 speed machine uses the sr motor and the e2 uses the carbon brush motor,hence the cooling filter.How has this sr motor worked out? any problems with the computor control boards?.

mole

JimRockford


Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Points: 2

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #21   Mar 11, 2008 11:16 pm
Hi,Actually Rexair did use the fact the Rainbow would not loose suction as part of their marketing campaign!

I collect vintage Rexair products and have a 1961 Model D "chrome dome" which still has its original Parents,Good Housekeeping & Better Homes and Gardens hang tags intact and attached to its handle!

The back of the better homes and gardens tag has a Rexair Ad which shows the cleaner and bears the text....

"Sick and Tired of Cleaning Dust?,Rainbow will curtail your annoying dust problem!,All cleaners use airflow to clean,but because they force dirt through bags and dry filters airflow is reduced and decreases thier abilty to pick up dirt,as dirt clogs bag and filter pores airflow is further impeded!,thats why they clean much better with a new bag or filter...RAINBOW USES NO BAGS OR DRY FILTERS! the dust is trapped in Rainbows turbulent water bath which has no pores to clog.there is never a reduction in airflow,never a drop in cleaning efficiency..WITH RAINBOW YOU DONT CHASE DUST,YOU TRAP IT IN WATER!"

Its interesting to note that Rainbow didnt get a power nozzle option until 1974!,I dont understand that..RCA Whirlpool vacs had them in the late 50's..so did Lewyt...and of course the Electrolux G had one in 1960! What took Rexair so long?

The Hepa filter added on the current models was done because water doesnt trap all the dust,some things such as talcum powder,plaster and ash,blow right past the water and out into the exhaust air.

When Rainbow came out with their D3 model in 1980  this fact became quite obvious as they had routed the exhaust under a transparent dome,before long all the dust that blew past the water had clouded the inner dome and owners started complaining and asking why there was dust buildup when the water was supposed to trap it all.

Rainbow quickly dropped the d3 after only a few years and came out with the d4 in 1984 which deliberatly routed the exhaust air under the bottom of the cleaner so it never passed through the translucent dome...clever huh?!

The current models have a Hepa filter..(or hepa "neutralizer" as the slick salesman call them to avoid questions ) because they got sick of taking a beating in the consumer reports tests which placed rainbow at the bottom of the list when it came to blow by!...so now by the addition of this filter,the cleaner doesnt really have "constant suction" because the hepa DOES become blocked with dust and impedes the airflow.

I have to agree with a previous poster,I think the price of the current Rainbows are out of line and the slick used car salesman type high pressure tactics used to sell them are ridiculous.

Why not just drop the price and market the cleaner in normal fashion?

I went to a Rainbow dealer recently looking for old parts for one of my d2's and couldnt believe the fast talk and buzzwords that were being thrown about to sell the machine. It was like the old snake oil salesman bit.

They would'nt even call the e2 a vacuum (which it quite obviously is) they would only call it "the rainbow system" the salesman are also told not to use the word "suction" but rather "airflow" instead. suction is airflow!

Its all pretty pretentious.

That being said,I love the classic d & d2 series of Rainbow,in my opinion that was the best cleaner they ever made and they should never have changed it.

It really was the machine of tommorow,today!  todays vacuums arent futuristic. Modern technology isnt fun like it was in the 50's and 60's when everything looked like something from the Jetsons.

I dont mind the wieght of the machine or the "work" it takes to use and care for it. I enjoy using my Rainbow D2 and like the unique water filtration system. Its never a chore. Its an amazing machine!

Rexair even markets Rainbow fragerances which smell incredible.just a few drops and your home smells great!

Today all the vacuums are ugly plastic throw away piles of crap,made for todays ugly plastic throw away culture....our culture declined when the fins came off our cars.

This message was modified Mar 12, 2008 by JimRockford
camelotshadow


Location: 2Manyvacuums
Joined: Mar 16, 2008
Points: 23

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #22   Mar 16, 2008 3:16 pm
Hi..I'm glad I found this place

Somewhere over the rainbow my rainbow d3C came all cracked

Darn DHL...looke like it got caught in a twister in Kansas

So now I search for a good case

Does anyone have any opinions on the strong points on the various models?

I want the water pick up feature & I believe that started with the D3

Does the D2 pick up water?

I like the sound of my d3C motor

I  know the D4 motor is different has anyone\heard the various motors

& would like to comment on the sound?

I have heard the new E models are really LOUD

I have a bird & need the strong smooth purring motor

I really like my D3C

but its really badly messed up cracks screw holes broken

& still hoping DHL might make some restitution.

Bad thing about the rainbow is some particles may not enter the water

oily type etc smoke ash so I have been adding a drop pf simple green to the basin water

I feel it might help dissolve a better catch a oily particle

Any comments  on this laborious but inventive vac are appreciated

as instead of trying to find a new case & basin for this I might opt for another used in a different model.

Venson


Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #23   Mar 16, 2008 5:37 pm
Hi,

You can do wet pick-up with any Rainbow or Rexair made.  Squeegee attachments, first the standard bare floor tool fitted with rubber strips in place of brushes, were around all the way back to the Rexair days.  The D2 offered a better designed tool for floor scrubbing and wet pick-up. Having owned a few of these over time and though it will increase weight, I strongly suggest that you use the four-quart water pan and keep an extra hose on hand for "wet work".  I never liked using the same hose or the metal wands for dry and wet jobs.  You should also be sure to keep a watchful eye on the cleaner as there is no way to prevent it from over-filling otherwise.

Rexair/Rainbow is and has always been an acquired taste as far as vacuums go.  You either love them or  find you can quite easily live without them.  The water needed for filtering adds extra weight -- not necessarily a problem in a single-story home but a pain for some when moving up and down stairs. Not great either when what you're doing -- like cleaning the top of bookcases -- requires you to tote the cleaner along. 

Depending on the individual, maintenance may or may not prove an irksome chore. Rainbow is not a machine you just take out of the closet and get up and go with or then put away immediately after use.  Without proper care, thorough cleaning and drying after use and regular water changes while in use, investment in a Rainbow is a pure waste of time and money. To do otherwise means dirt that does not get caught in the water pan may end up on the fans and also build up on the inner unit housing.  

It's good that you are aware of the dry pick-up limitations.  It is not wise to use a Rainbow to clean soot, ash or plaster dust but it's probably not a good idea to do that with any household vacuum though I've seen some old Luxes used to plow through all manner of stuff and still keep going.  Anyway, my fun Rainbow story is the time I accidentally picked up powdered laundry detergent with a D2 I owned. No, no bubbles everywhere but the sputtering of the motor scared me into believing I'd killed it but good.  However, it just took a couple of days to let the unit sit and dry out before it was as good as new.

The D4 used a by-pass motor.  In other words, the armature, etc., were not cooled by air from the suction stream but a separate cooling fan.  This would mean less damage possibilties if water got pulled into the fan chamber.  A link to a schematic follows:

http://www.elkypro.com/hoops2005/vacuum_parts/rexair/D4.html

Part are available but for what Rainbows cost used these days, I suggest getting another whether or not DHL comes through.  Being an eBay and online shopper it's best to have the package insured.  It costs a couple of dollars more but proves worth it in situations like yours.

Here's hoping DHL refunds you in full.  Best of luck . . .

Venson

camelotshadow


Location: 2Manyvacuums
Joined: Mar 16, 2008
Points: 23

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #24   Mar 16, 2008 8:13 pm
Thanks

I like it for spraying the rugs with water & wet vacking

sort of light clean

I have been under filling the basin so as not to pick up too much

I do watch

D4 blew air down by pass is it a better motor?

I like the look of the D2/D3 motor

This is my idea then

since the d2/d3 motor is the same

I can alos try to put my motor in a D2 casing

depends what I find

Wonder if it would work?

Rainbows plastic is fragile

It was shipped free so I had no choice of insurance but I think they give min $100 anyway

Damage may have resulted from inproper packaging ot latent stress cracks broke open

Its a mess you'd cry if you sae it

I spent a day trying to glue the seams together as they weren't in half yet.

I agree its not to carry up stairs

& its not a everyday only if you have one vac

but as a 2nd novelty it;s useful.

I have the idea to spin it not over the basin a few seconds to purge any residual water from the system

I am one who likes to see the junk & its alot easier to throw out the water then to clean out the hoover windtunnel & shake the hepa

Yikes but what powder that thing endlessly picks up got me thinking I did need to do some wet cleaning..

Cord is even missing the ground wire

So the only good thing on it is the motor & dolly

I might just be able to pop it into another case or even fit it to the D2 if I find a good one with dead motor...

I had read the D3 was the first approved for wet pick up though

so I am not sure what the difference in the D2 & D3 is...

Thanks Again  for your help

camelotshadow


Location: 2Manyvacuums
Joined: Mar 16, 2008
Points: 23

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #25   Mar 18, 2008 5:29 pm
Tha rainbow history site liste the D3 with its new cooler running motor as the first rainbow approved for "wet pick up"

Does that mean the previous models couldn't do it or weren't approved to do it?

The motors in the D2 & D3 are the same but I guess they could be hooked up differently?

Calling Mr Bubbles for help....

Would the D2 construction not be good for wet pick up?

I really want one on the older R2D2's but I would like to pick up minimal water too without it sputtering

Thanks...

This message was modified Mar 18, 2008 by camelotshadow
Venson


Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900

Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #26   Mar 18, 2008 9:25 pm
camelotshadow wrote:
Tha rainbow history site liste the D3 with its new cooler running motor as the first rainbow approved for "wet pick up"

Does that mean the previous models couldn't do it or weren't approved to do it?

The motors in the D2 & D3 are the same but I guess they could be hooked up differently?

Calling Mr Suds for help....

Would the D2 construction not be good for wet pick up?

I really want one on the older R2D2's but I would like to pick up minimal water too without it sputtering

Thanks...



Hi Camelot,

I have never heard of any specific "approval" for wet pick-up being given regarding either Rexair or Rainbow.  Yet, as I stated before there have been attachments made by Rexair specifically for wet pick-up at least as far back as the Model C Rexair and for the D2 Rainbow  --- I've owned one -- there was an optional tool for floor scrubbing and wet pick-up.  It was similar to the head on the first Hoover floor washer.

Rexair/Rainbow has been using water as a filtration medium for years and even though these at one point all metal, ungrounded vacuums could be tipped over while in use, knocked over on a flight of stairs, etc. etc., UL apparently found no fault with them.

I have a Model C that I haul out for small wet emergencies.  I use it with the four quart metal water pan that came with a Model B I bought for stuff like draining out the dishwasher after a breakdown or defrosting a refrigerator from the olden days.  Any Rainbow can be used for wet pick-up but as I also said prior, you have to be vigilant to assure that you do let the water pan overfill.  In that sense, because of low capacity, Rainbow is not really all that useful for wet pick-up duty. Other non-water type vacuums that also to be good for wet pick-up tasks use a floatation valve to prevent motor damage or the possibility of electrical shock.  Rainbow has made no accommodation for the like and  -- as a common sense call -- I would imagine that is why the company can or should not seriously recommend the cleaner for wet jobs.  Too many users might not be watchful.

Also due to its limitations, I didn't give Rainbow's carpet cleaning paraphenalia a second thought.  It's simpler to rent or buy a domestic machine for the job plus get a better result. 

Yet for all this discussion, I can't imagine many household jobs where using a Rainbow for wet pick-up is feasible.  I wouldn't haul one out and put it together just for the small spills it can handle.  I'd get a mop.  I wouldn't use it for floor scrubbing as my use of cleaning substances would be limited.  No suds allowed -- remember?

Regards,

Venson

Replies: 17 - 26 of 31Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
Vacuum Cleaners Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.
Site by Take 42