Abby's Guide to Copiers
Username Password
Home Discussions Reviews More Guides

Member Profile


CarmineD

Name Carmine DiFazio
Email Address private
AIM
YIM
ICQ
Gender
Age
Location
Personal Quote
Privileges Normal user
Rank
Points 4162
Number of Posts 4132
Number of Reviews 2
Date Joined Dec 31, 2007
Date Last Access Today 1:44 pm
CarmineD's last  
Re: Samsung's- Dirt Devil Eraser / Halo inspired UV patent.
#1   Today 1:39 pm
DysonInventsBig wrote:
Economic Rights?  Those are the words of lazy men and men who are supportive to knock-off manufacturers,  No free ride here Carmine and no 'Free Handout Rights' either.

When you speak incoherently and continually speak about a topic you've never understood - one wonders if it’s booze talking.

Why not take your theory of 'Economic/Free Handout Rights' over to Coca Cola and demand your rights - to their formulas.

I hate slothfulness and hate it more when the diligent and the good are expected and told to (and often do) carry the lazy?


DIB




dyson DiB, you're dithering again not debating.  Yes, economic rights are inalienable rights granted to consumers in a free, market based, consumer driven economy.  Unlike legal rights which are government given in a free market economy for patent/copyright protections and are time specific.  Read: Expire.  The purpose of protections is to give the invention creators their just rewards.  Not to grant them a monopoly for life.   Of course, you support the billionaire's rights over the consumer rights in the market place.  Control the consumer, don't satisfy them.  All the while impugning vacuum makers for lack of innovation.   Monopolies preempt innovation, my friend.  But, then again, small minded inventors and their supporters prefer to litigate rather than innovate. 

Carmine D.

Re: Samsung's- Dirt Devil Eraser / Halo inspired UV patent.
#2   Yesterday 9:39 pm
DysonInventsBig wrote:
Copy rights?  Communist?  You’re incoherent...are you drinkin?  You've never been able to get your head around patents and their purpose. - So why start now?

FYI - Inventions are patented not copyrighted.


DIB



dyson DiB:

Same same my friend.  Impress us by debating technological innovations, your mantra, and their legal protections on the industry.  Not by word use and definition.    

Patent and copyright protections are not just a legal right granted the creator.  They are economic rights of the market place and consumers.  Or, do you prefer that they be used to control consumers rather than satisfy them?  The latter is called a monopoly.  And not the board game.  You can't have product innovation with innovative technologies in a monopoly.  Nor can it be had in a government controlled market system, which appears to be your preference when your fave inventor is the patent creator.

Carmine D.

Re: Dyson Canada's sister [pet] site - "DysonAnimal.ca". Nicly done!
#3   Yesterday 6:47 pm
The "d" brand may get your personal kudos for its graphics when it comes to the "animal" moniker BUT..........for actual performance the December 2009 Consumer Reports recommends the HOOVER WindTunnel bag and bagless Anniverary upright models for households with pets/animals AS WELL AS all other rug and bare floor cleaning.  The EUREKA upright pet series product line does well for pet/animal cleaning and overall rug cleaning but falls short on bare floor performance, leaving it off the CR list of recommended.

Carmine D.

Re: bug
#4   Yesterday 12:35 pm
admin wrote:
Hello all.

We just discovered that some users are unable to see the toolbar above the "Your message" area.  The toolbar has a on the far right side.  If you don't see the toolbar please respond to this post with your browser and operating system so we can fix it soon.

Thanks,
Craig



I think my ORECK with UV-C light got the bug!

Carmine D.

Re: Samsung's- Dirt Devil Eraser / Halo inspired UV patent.
#5   Yesterday 12:33 pm
DysonInventsBig wrote:
Trebor,

I do not understand why defending those with low expectations or defending the lazy is worth spending time on.  Feel free to point out all the patents Dyson has stepped on or immediately jumped on after a competitors patent has expired.  Most vacuum related patents are dogs, so Dyson jumping on them is highly unlikely.

Get over it?  You make these multi-million and multi-billion dollar corporations sound like victims and entitled.  Any neophyte can grab expired patents (parts) off the shelf and assemble them in a so-called novel way (not a patentable way for sure).  I say these $500m to $3b corporation’s ain’t entitled to 'jack' and neither are their slimy hustler reps.  Get over it.

DIB


dyson DIB:

You're talking from two sides of your mouth.  On one hand you want a monopoly on dyson's inventions and on the other you berate vacuum makers for their lack of new technologies.  Well, DIB you can't have it both ways.  Monopolies, for the sake of protecting creators' technologies, are not efficient for a market based, consumer driven economy.  Perhaps Sir James needs to file his copy rights and sell his products in communist/ government controlled countries.

Carmine D.

Copiers Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2009 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.
Site by Take 42