| Name |
Mike W. |
| Email Address |
private |
| AIM |
|
| YIM |
|
| ICQ |
|
 |
| Gender |
|
| Age |
|
| Location |
|
 |
| Personal Quote |
"Take care of your vacuum, then your vacuum will take care of you" |
|
| Privileges |
 |
Moderator |
|
| Rank |
    |
| Points |
1448 |
| Number of Posts |
68 |
| Number of Reviews |
2 |
| Date Joined |
Dec 1, 2004 |
| Date Last Access |
Aug 14, 2008 10:17 pm |
|
 |
Re: 1959 Hamilton Beach Hat Box Vacuum on Ebay
#1 Aug 14, 2008 12:41 pm |
|
Too late to leave it alone, Mike. You shed some light here and revealed an observation that I didn't realize/know. Now, I want to look at it and talk about it. Specifically, please answer this question: Is it against the rules of protocol of this site to post about ebay listings here? If the poster owns the auction? If the poster does not? Carmine D. It is not against the rules to post ebay listings here. That is why this thread was not deleted. Posting links or referring others to your site is against the rules. You can pay to have links posted. Notice those ads on the side? This site gets money for those ads being there. So why should someone come on here and post a link to their website, phone number, or address of their business for free, when others pay for it? In the past, I have deleted posts where someone has come on here and posted links to their website. They come on with "have you tried this product yet, WOW! It is great!" Or, "tell me what you think." It can be anything, including porno. Posting your own ebay auction should be considered the same thing, but there are no specific rules, yet. There will be soon, because we do know what will happen. So when red flags come up, all one can do is point out something that looks suspicious. Now, don't anyone get on their "high horse" and say "Well, I never". Oh, yes, you have. Think through the years, on all the different sites. Remember someone coming on and "selling" a Kirby. Then someone comes on and points out that it is a Kirby salesman. How about this site? I think I have read where someone has made mention of dyson salesmen. So all one can do is point out suspicious points made. I hope that answered your question(s), Carmine. BTW, if anyone has any comments, just email me.
|
 |
Re: Miele S5 bags
#2 Aug 14, 2008 5:42 am |
|
Did I remember an issue with the bags for the S5 in which they would burst, or had a weak spot because of the suction? I thought I had read this before in the old forum. I'm asking because I just bought a used machine and under the HEPA filter it's filthy. I'm wondering if the bag broke previously, or if things normally accumulate under the filter? I do not recall any issues w/ Miele bags, except there was one person who used the IntensiveClean bags at its introduction. The issue was that hair was sticking through the material of the "clothlike" bags and not staying inside the bag.
|
 |
Re: Arm & Hammer "Fresh Ins" . . .
#3 Aug 14, 2008 5:36 am |
|
Do you have any knowlegde of how well single-ply knock-offs made to fit Electrolux did back in the day as opposed to the genuine article? Generic vacuum cleaner bags, from the past, were very bad. They were thin, filtered worse than name brand and sometimes were not made-to-fit properly. In the 70's I had a Electrolux 1205. I used generic multiply bags that performed very well. I set the automatic control so that it would shut off at 3/4 full. I found some generic, cheap bags. They were horrible. They were thin and single-ply. There was no membrane dirt seal at the bag opening. When the controls were set at the same as w/the multiply bags, the vacuum would shut off at 1/4 full. Those bags were never used again. Generic bags have changed, for the better, compared to years ago. If the microlined bags, or better, are used, filtration is pretty good. Envirocare bags are another brand of generics that perform very well. Some brands of vacuum cleaners just perform better if genuine is used. FQ is one that performed better w/ genuine cones. They fit perfectly and filter much better.
|
 |
Re: Arm & Hammer "Fresh Ins" . . .
#4 Aug 14, 2008 5:14 am |
|
Hello Venson: It appears that you have to contact an A&H person to get a price quote on a particular brand, unless of course you find them in the retailers. From reading the claims by A&H, the bags/filters are outstanding. A&H is making the vacuum bags and filters a mainstay venue for its operations. I'm curious to hear the opinions from the indies about the quality and performace of the A&H bags/filters if they have experience using and selling. Carmine D. Walmart sells A&H vacuum cleaner bags and filters for many different brands. HOOVER, Eueka, and DD taking most of the space. At one time, I did recall seeing ORECK bags. These were for the older uprights that did not have the docking port. They were priced slightly higher than other bags like HOOVER Windtunnel. They were about the same as the Pet Fresh bags. I want to say they were about $6.99approx. for a 3pk., but I could be wrong. Electrolux Homecare is the maker of these bags and filters. They are using the A&H name. The same w/ Homecare using the Honeywell name. These bags are high quality. I believe they are using a new technology. What I do not like about their filters is that they are not washable. Washing the filter will decrease the effectiveness of the baking soda. The name brand filters of many vacuum cleaners use washable filters that will last a couple of years. I believe the A&H brand says to replace between 6-12 mos. Another thing I do not like about these brands is now they can charge a higher price for the bags/filters compared to the previous generic. So, you could have purchased Homecare microlined bags for $3.50+. Now, under the Honeywell name, the bags will cost you $5.99.
|
 |
Re: 1959 Hamilton Beach Hat Box Vacuum on Ebay
#5 Aug 13, 2008 9:13 pm |
|
Carmine;
Just leave it alone. It is just an observation.
|
|